so does this mean the whole thing went nowhere
I'm a California attorney, "with prejudice" means that the case is resolved and the plaintiff cannot file another suit based upon the same or similar facts. It would only be dismissed "with prejudice" if there was a settlement. Otherwise, the plaintiff would dismiss it "without prejudice" (i.e. he can file again within the statute of limitations). Who knows how much the settlement was for or who paid it. Moz could have had an insurance company who decided to settle it to avoid legal costs or if they believed there was some exposure to liability. But we are likely to hear nothing about the result absent a leak because there will be a confidentiality clause. Final note, a settlement does not necessarily mean that the plaintiff had anything real to complain about. Companies and individuals settle all of the time, because of the cost to fight and whether the evidence seems to support the plaintiff's complaint (even though the "real" facts do not).
I'm no legal expert but from asking around a bit, I think it likely means there was some sort of settlement and adding the 'with prejudice' as part of the settlement so the case would end here. Steyn's lawyer could have requested it to be dismissed without that part if he just wanted to drop it.
That's right, you are no legal expert. I'm not sure if asking around a bit helps your case either. No one knows what happened for sure so it's all just speculation.
I talked to some legal experts so maybe it does. willnevermarry posted something similar and is a California attorney. Also, since the case was earlier reported as 'close to settling', I don't think it's that far off to say it was likely settled.
I talked to some legal experts so maybe it does. willnevermarry posted something similar and is a California attorney. Also, since the case was earlier reported as 'close to settling', I don't think it's that far off to say it was likely settled.
I'm no legal expert but from asking around a bit, I think it likely means there was some sort of settlement and adding the 'with prejudice' as part of the settlement so the case would end here. Steyn's lawyer could have requested it to be dismissed without that part if he just wanted to drop it.
and speculation about public figures is fun
"I am Human and I Need to Be Loved... Just Line Everybody Else Does...."
I retract the aforementioned statement! Now where is my big block of cheeeeeseeeee?????
Benny-the-British-Butcher
I talked to some legal experts so maybe it does. willnevermarry posted something similar and is a California attorney. Also, since the case was earlier reported as 'close to settling', I don't think it's that far off to say it was likely settled.
Who's Julia?
Nobody cares about this except you DavidT, you sad muppet. Your 15 minutes of fame are over, so crawl back under your rock and take this has-been site with you. Twitter, Youtube, Facebook and Instagram give us all the concert info we need now, whilst you don't get a set list for two days and there is barely a review to be seen - instead we get the delusional ramblings of bedroom Smiths fans who haven't been to a concert since 1984. It's over David. Go, just go. Go. Go. Go on, go.
Nobody cares about this except you DavidT, you sad muppet. Your 15 minutes of fame are over, so crawl back under your rock and take this has-been site with you. Twitter, Youtube, Facebook and Instagram give us all the concert info we need now, whilst you don't get a set list for two days and there is barely a review to be seen - instead we get the delusional ramblings of bedroom Smiths fans who haven't been to a concert since 1984. It's over David. Go, just go. Go. Go. Go on, go.
You care enough to check in. Lol.
Nobody cares about this except you DavidT, you sad muppet. Your 15 minutes of fame are over, so crawl back under your rock and take this has-been site with you. Twitter, Youtube, Facebook and Instagram give us all the concert info we need now, whilst you don't get a set list for two days and there is barely a review to be seen - instead we get the delusional ramblings of bedroom Smiths fans who haven't been to a concert since 1984. It's over David. Go, just go. Go. Go. Go on, go.
true and fair enough. I wonder if this will hurt his chances of finding work in the field in the future. honest question as I just don't know if its a career killer or just par for the course
one can only be beefy by eating beef. am i correct? he has steadily been gaining weight year in year out only consuming vegetables? thats impossible. every true and real vegan i know is rail thin.
I went to the Wawa for an Italian Hogie yesterday and there were ads all over with Morrisseys name on it for the firefly festival. Even next to the machines where you order milkshakes and club sandwiches.They don't call him 'Silly Steven' for nothing you know ! Judge Weeks had three other names for him and they have stuck like shit to a blanket.
Solo 1 CrankFraud 0
How can someone so vegan sing the songs at F Y F FESTIVAL ?
Steven take a Steven take a bow
And boot the crime of this world in the crotch dear !
4ck Tosserrey t-shirt anyone ?
Benny-the-British-Butcher