I wonder what happened.
By "general consensus" you obviously mean the Usual Suspects on here (which doesn't amount to many people). There was Morrissey's perception and there was Marr's perception - and both were "right" because both believed they had legitimate grievances and that the band wasn't developing in the way each of them wanted it to - although by that time, each of their artistic ambitions were no longer shared by the other. But, as the partnership that created The Smiths, each of their ambitions and viewpoints were/are equally valid. To suggest that there is some kind of favoured objective consensus whereby one person's perception was somehow more valid than the other is nonsense, that's just schoolyard side-taking.
Or she could be referring to accounts from Joe Moss, Grant Showbiz, Stephen Street, and others who worked closely with The Smiths which all suggest that mounting pressure on Marr due to Morrissey's difficult behavior and unwillingness to be managed lead to Marr's decision to abandon the band.
I agree that the demise of The Smiths is not as black and white as some people paint it, and Marr himself has admitted he could have handled matters more gracefully, but a consistent narrative has definitely developed from the accounts of numerous parties involved, and Morrissey's version of events deviates significantly from the others.
I've always suspected Morrissey & Marr are not as proud of Strangeways as they've let on in interviews. It's a good record, but certainly not their best. Perhaps they've felt a need to praise it as the best simply because it was the last? As someone very sad that they split, from this vantage point, I have a hard time imaging how they would have proceeded. As the 80's ended the music scene that embraced The Smiths was rapidly changing. Marr would have wanted to evolve with the times and Morrissey would have fought it. I could see them making one, maybe two more albums ... but beyond that ... I just don't see it. Their creative differences/tension was just too great to allow it.
Agree/disagree?
I wonder what happened.
I think Marr had enough of Morrissey's hissy fits. The story of him refusing to open the door and Johnny saying he was done comes to mind. Aren't they on speaking terms now, though?
Johnny said something to the effect that there's only so many times you can try to contact someone and they don't reply before you just say f*** it.
There is a new "Q" magazine out with U2 on the cover. Johnny has a 2 page interview in that and he says exactly that in it....Johnny said something to the effect that there's only so many times you can try to contact someone and they don't reply before you just say f*** it.
It's a harmless B side. It was hardly a sign of things to come. A little perspective goes a long way.
What a prima donna Johnny Marr is. The Smiths were a business relationship with real contracts. How many of us work in places where we can demand real friendships along with our little paychecks? Johnny Marr signed bad contracts. Then he breached them. Both of them. Now he blames the breakdown in friendships and claims he was destined to be in many bands. So, what kind of "friend" is easily persuaded to freeze out the lead singer? Johnny Marr. That's the kind of friend.
Actually he has a point and anyone following news and interviews about the split up in the following years always read that session was the death knell for Marr. He (Marr) cited it for years
I've always suspected Morrissey & Marr are not as proud of Strangeways as they've let on in interviews. It's a good record, but certainly not their best. Perhaps they've felt a need to praise it as the best simply because it was the last? As someone very sad that they split, from this vantage point, I have a hard time imaging how they would have proceeded. As the 80's ended the music scene that embraced The Smiths was rapidly changing. Marr would have wanted to evolve with the times and Morrissey would have fought it. I could see them making one, maybe two more albums ... but beyond that ... I just don't see it. Their creative differences/tension was just too great to allow it.
Agree/disagree?
The real problem was that the label were basically useless, the managers were amateurs, the press people were also used to dealing with "average" bands. They just could not cope with the brilliantly talented, artistic, perfectionist and very determined and special, Morrissey.
I surmise (from various books and interviews) that the relationship broke down due to Morrissey ultimately treating Johnny in the exact same way he had treat many others before along the way. Cancelled television appearances (Wogan) and video shoots without bothering to even inform Johnny as if he weren't an equal partner and the final straw being Moz recruiting Joyce to do his bidding where once it would have been Johnny.
If you read Tony Fletcher's book, Johnny admits feeling isolated from the rest of the band during the last B-Side recording sessions held by Grant Showbiz. Basically, I think it got to the point where Johnny just thought f*** this - I created this band, wrote all the tunes along with producing and managing and now the drummer is telling me what I'm meant to be playing. You can kind of see his point to be fair.
i bet it is because Moz is always wrong, everything he personally chooses or influences is wrong. I bet it is because the Earth hasn't known any greater evil than Steven Patrick Morrissey and any, no EVERYthing negative in life and entertainment is because Morrissey was born to some black Irish bastards.
I'm glad there is a website devoted only to identifying Morrissey as the antichrist and highlighting all of his failures, ie. everything he does from the moment he goes to sleep to the moment he fails to die.
It is true Morrissey has added nothing to the world but whine and cheese. Real true artists, like Andy Rourke - the bass playing extraordinaire from James Franco's band "Daddy," has changed the world as we know it and someday will create World Peace when they change their name to Wyld Stallyns...
Generally I only post on AndyRourke-solo.com and MikeJoyce-solo.com and JohnnyMarr-solo.com but when I saw somehow there was a site created for the only purpose of pissing on that musical nobody, Morrissey, well I had to jump on board.
Luckily songs like Easy Money and
http://www.vice.com/read/watch-the-meta-music-video-by-james-francos-band-daddy-455
show us that there really are poets in the music industry, even if it is only 3 working class manc prods AND james franco, BUT not Morrissey, never morrissey.
hell, at least Mike and Andy never cancel a gig. Every Sunday, like clockwork, I see Mike with his white plastic 5 gallon buckets and Andy with his bass case open in Times Square.
I remember throwing a few coins at them right after i bought a book covering the poetry and artwork of johnny marr..
thank christ for this site, amen.
Whatever broke -- and Biography makes a good case for Johnny being a c*** -- he was destined never to do anything nearly as good again. The other guy has somewhat eclipsed him.