· Morrissey reddit
· Reissue promo sleeves
· No Roy's Keen on Maladjusted reissue - confirmed
·
· Click to enlarge
·
· Click to enlarge
· More Release Info stories
· More Index stories
· Also by davidt
Morrissey-solo
Archive
|
|
|||||||||
posted by
davidt
on Thursday March 19 2009, @12:00PM
Kewpie sends the links to the post in the forums by lutewhine (via Morrissey reddit):
Reissue promo sleeves and No Roy's Keen on Maladjusted reissue - confirmed
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
<em>Southpaw Grammar</em> and <em>Maladjusted</em> reissue promos / info
| Top
| 79 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|||||||||
|
Lutewine is still the only source (Score:1, Interesting)
I pointed out why Lutewine doesn't have enough credibility to make this a main page post.
Sincerely,
Lukainexile
sillygoose
winkwink
puddle
Reissue, repackage.... (Score:0)
(User #22167 Info | http://twitter.com/iCalig)
Looks like a bootleg... (Score:1, Insightful)
Doesn't fit into the grand artwork of Ringleader, Best Of or Refusal.
Fake (Score:0)
No fakes (Score:1, Informative)
http://www.recordstore.co.uk/productdetail.jsp?productPK=unittest-ALqY1R94YgQn9lRZpN3IEb-1
Fake (Score:1)
(User #19741 Info)
I won't believe a thing.... (Score:2, Insightful)
Why would someone waste their time and the time of many others' to post something like this?
David, I've never suggested this before because I am an advocate of free speech, but this should really be taken down...unless there's some validity...don't you think?
(User #2326 Info)
Amateur hour (Score:0)
Received an email from eil this morning detailing the 'Southpaw' re-release. It said the reissue comes with 4 unreleased tracks, including 'Nobody Loves Us'. It's incredible how inaccurate these official blurbs often are.
James Keen
Someone at the PR company has a crappy printer (Score:0)
http://www.morrissey-solo.com/article.pl?sid=08/09/23/0616236
So this is either the PR/Record company are really shitty and can't produce and print a simple promo (quite likely!) or this is fake (very likely!).
I don't think these types of record company put out promo's on CD-R's with inkjet printed labels.
In the meantime, here's a lovely tune...lalalala, doobedowap yodel yodel yodel.
if this is fo' real i don't understand... (Score:0)
New pictures? (Score:0)
I've never seen these Morrissey pictures before, so they must come from someone who has access to such things.
Are these pictures by Jake again, like the last three singles and the Best Of inner sleeve?
Sony Music??? (Score:0)
And who is responsible for both artworks?
What's going on here anyway? These reissues really confuse me.
I'd Love To (Score:1, Funny)
Southpaw (Score:2, Insightful)
(User #17834 Info)
US Issue (Score:1)
(User #16714 Info)
Timing! (Score:0)
Yum!
Why? (Score:0)
As a long standing fan with much affection for both of these much maligned LPs I must say it's borderline sacrilegious he's replaced the previous artwork with duller than dishwater photos of him pretending to be from the 50s/James Dean/Elvis or whatever. The original Southpaw sleeve had a lot of character and stood out on the shelf. Why try to play the revisionist 10+ years on?
Secondly, the running orders of these LPs - a very important factor in any album of worth - has been f*cked over to the point where they're unrecognisable. Again, why? A nice crisp remaster of the album as it was plus a second disc of rarities, b sides and live material would've been far more attractive and left the listener with the album as it was released on those days in 1995 and 1997.
I actually genuinely and completely hope these aren't the finished product.
why these are fake (Score:0)
we are asked to believe that BOTH Sony and Universal - who are not related companies issued morrissey advances with the exact same packaging? no fucking way. these are fake david.
nobody loves us (Score:2, Interesting)
plus the graphic design is way too amateur to be true.
(User #17421 Info)
Come on.... (Score:0)
Fake fools - get ready for egg on your faces (Score:0)
Hahahahahahahaha!
I share a flat with a freelance journalist (who isn't even a Moz fan) and they got theirs in the post yesterday. They come from a reputable London PR - who also does PR for Springsteen.
Wake up and smell the coffee, kids.
Real Deal! (Score:0)
The sign above the title? (Score:1)
(User #5731 Info)
I don't mean to be an old fart but... (Score:0)
Ben
You say fake, I say real (Score:2, Insightful)
Let's call the whole thing off.
If Morrissey is reading any of this he must be giggling into his Earl Grey.
Until they are released, who knows and who cares. Let's all have a debate on whether we like the cover art and track listing when we actually have the records in our hands / on our downloads. At the moment we are possibly part of the most childishly squabbling troupe on the web. Give at a few weeks and several people can have the last laugh. Until then, why don't we all concentrate on the fact that Moz is re-releasing two of his worst received albums with possibly better artwork and better track listings.
(User #14229 Info)
Photos and ommissions (Score:1)
So I am glad the photo was changed. I am kinda curious at the track ommisions and can only assume that this was an editing mistake and that it will be corrected. Otherwise it makes no sense to reissue the album at all. Plus its not one of Moz's best anyhow.
(User #12769 Info)
All those... (Score:0)
Don't let the packaging fool you - these could very well be the real deal.
Besides who would be bored enough to fabricate Morrissey reissues for two fairly obscure 90s albums that nobody bar the usual suspects are really going to wet themselves over. Let's face it and realistically they won't be charting top 40 let alone top 10.
I vote genuine and totally agree the running orders should have been left alone.
To all those thinking these are fake... (Score:1)
Thanks for listening.
(User #10051 Info)
Looks real to me (Score:0)
Why These two Albums? (Score:0)
Presuming they're real... (Score:1)
Love the Southpaw Grammar pic - class.
But Maladjusted, which was a low ebb period in Morrissey's life - this is when his career was at its lowest and everyone was seemingly loosing interest (he just wasn't VALID in 1997 compared to 2004) - seems like a wrong cover image.
It shows a confident Morrissey from that year. I think that Maladjusted, for it's faults, is a hidden gem in the Moz cannon and should be reappreciated, but should have a very REFLECTIVE image on the sleeve. Not so cocky.
Anyway, good to see 'Nobody Loves Us' closing Southpaw Grammar. I maintain that this is the best song ever, ever
GIZ A CHEER "NOBODY LOVES US" FANS!!!!
(User #9752 Info | http://www.stanleymchale.merseyblogs.co.uk/)
Fakes or not....who cares? (Score:0)
Morrissey is not about *top 10* hits, beer & skittles....
Get a life. If you don't like the albums, don't buy them! Simple as.
This typo says fake (Score:0)
Does the Maladjusted tracklist really say "Now I Am I Was"?
If so, 1:0 for being a fake, especially since these reissues are said to have been overseen by Morrissey himself. Doubt so.