If 'Prince' William Were Black ... - true-to-you.net (March 17, 2016): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "Category:Morrissey Statement Category:true-to-you.net Statement ==Summary== ==Statement== <blockquote> Additionally, if 'Prince' William had endorsed shooting and kil...")
 
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
[[Category:true-to-you.net Statement]]
[[Category:true-to-you.net Statement]]
==Summary==
==Summary==
Regarding [[Mention::William, Prince of Wales|Prince William]] & hunting


==Statement==
==Statement==
Line 16: Line 17:


[[File:William.jpg|200px|thumb|none|]]
[[File:William.jpg|200px|thumb|none|]]
If any animal living freely can manage to survive to reach an 'old age', why shoot it? Should it not be cherished for its determination against born killers such as 'Prince' William?
Today Kensington Palace has attempted to counterbalance the bad publicity William The Terrible received for his usual kill!-kill!-kill! statements by running a smiling story of him presenting Irish soldiers with a shamrock. Well, big deal. No sign of William celebrating the disintegration of SeaWorld. This is BBC reality, and no wonder England is morally bankrupt.
William, please go away - to any of the many other islands owned by your grandmother. Go there. Stay there. Spare us of your children, and for your own sake, say not another word. You are an intellectual embarrassment.
MORRISSEY
17 March 2016.


</blockquote>
</blockquote>


Archived [http://web.archive.org/web/20170423110920/http://true-to-you.net/morrissey_news_160317_03 original post here].
Archived [http://web.archive.org/web/20170423110920/http://true-to-you.net/morrissey_news_160317_03 original post here].
{{Page}}
{{Page
|Summary=Regarding Prince William & hunting
}}
{{PageDate
{{PageDate
|Date=2016-03-17
|Date=2016-03-17
}}
}}
Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators, xf_ug15, xf_ug2, xf_ug3, xf_ug4
10,981

edits