I can't see M winning any battles. And the far-right's "interesting" and "subversive" use of social media doesn't mean I'm going to agree with their bullshit. Fake news spreads quicker than real news - doesn't mean it's worth listening to. The way FB & twitter spreads rightwing agendas can be...
Since the article linked to is breitbart sticking up for itself, by linking to it it certainly seems M is sticking up for them.
Also, the Guardian doesn't hate M. They hate all this far-right bollocks he's doing. If he ditched the politics, they'd love him again. They print so much about him...
It is true. I'm not sure why you disbelieve me. Lots of people enjoy taking drugs. If only the governments would stop prohibition, the harm drugs can cause would be greatly reduced, and the dealers who seem to appal you would be respectably re-named pharmacists or something. People take drugs...
I don't think otherwise. That is true right now. It's changed during my lifetime, though; like I said, when I was a kid, terrorism meant IRA. It may change again. The point is, Islam doesn't have a monopoly on terrorism.
It's to do with Islamophobia. I can't think of a religion which isn't misogynist. FGM is cultural, not Islamic. Most religions are homophobic and many have harboured paedophiles. And terrorism? When I was growing up, terrorism meant the IRA. If it's about these things, Muslims shouldn't be...
No he didn't say eating dogs was worse than cows. But he implied it, by singling out the Chinese as a subspecies.
Yes i would agree an anim right activist would hate both. So why single out the Chinese?
Lots of people think it's ok to eat some animals but not others. I don't understand why.
But...
The sub-species quote from Moz was typical hyperbole. He was reacting to the Chinese (apparently) eating dogs. 'Sub-species' has overtones of racism, and is obviously inconsistent - if you stand up for animal rights, why is eating dogs any worse than eating cows? Are there no Chinese vegans...
John Lennon did bad things in his private life. Those things are widely ignored by his fanbase. It would have been different, I think, if he had said in interviews etc that it's ok to beat your woman.
Phil Spector was mentally ill.
Weinstein was a producer - a money man, not really responsible...
It's a shocking forum...obviously, because it is possible to post anonymously and the mods, if any exist, take no action. It's not hard - make everyone register before they can post and kick people off for being excessively abusive / offensive (including racism / homophobia).
If davidt hasn't...
All are biased to some degree. I read loads of em (online, like) and try to be aware of that. You simply cannot get unbiased news, even choosing which stories to report and how they are prioritised involves some bias.
But Breitbart?? Well they just take the piss.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.