Main
Nottingham review in The Times (Nov. 12)
Posted on Sun, Nov 14 1999 at 7:55 a.m. PST
by David T. <[email protected]>
From Karla Gerardo:

I found this non too flattering article about Morrissey from the Times regarding the Nottingham show.

Morrissey
Nottingham Rock City


STEVEN PATRICK MORRISSEY began this decade as a national institution, his reputation as one of the most acclaimed and original singer/songwriters since the Beatles seemingly carved in stone. But the 40-year-old ex-Smiths frontman greets the new millennium as an increasingly marginalised figure, without a record deal, vilified by his former champions in the music press, living an exile's life in Los Angeles.

Although his influence remains strong, on bands ranging from Pulp to Suede to Manic Street Preachers, years of creeping musical stagnation and an unhealthy fixation with a homoerotic fantasy underworld of racist thuggery have threatened to alienate this former bedsit laureate from a generation which once worshipped him.

Even so, there was no shortage of disciples at Rock City in Nottingham on Tuesday for the sold-out opening night of Morrissey's first British tour in three years. Feverish with anticipation, the capacity crowd beckoned their Mancunian messiah and his faceless rockabilly band onstage with rowdy football chants.

Looking like some craggy retired matinee idol, the wilfully anachronistic crooner returned his public's undying goodwill with a middling set of mostly recent material such as Boy Racer and Alma Matters. Where once his every performance packed an electrifying emotional charge, Morrissey now seems stuck in second gear, over reliant on laboured puns and gracelessly average melodies.

But even more frustrating were the teasing flashes of past glory which punctuated Tuesday's show.

The finest compositions from the singer's solo back catalogue were those dating back to his immediate post-Smiths period, including the brisk satire on London mores, Hairdresser on Fire, and the touchingly muted elegy to lost youth, Break Up the Family.

These tracks, as well as the audacious hymn to disability, November Spawned a Monster, still exhibited a sparky freshness which the more generic recent material sorely lacked. When presented with the evidence in such bald terms, it is difficult not to view Morrissey's career as being in slow but steady creative decline.

Tellingly, the biggest audience frissons of the evening were reserved for a smattering of choice archive gems from the Smiths scrapbook. The witty glam rock romp Is it Really So Strange? revisited Morrissey's love/hate relationship with his Northern roots, while a rare revival of the 1985 vegetarian anthem Meat is Murder was rapturously received.

Finally, a brusque encore reading of Last Night I Dreamt Somebody Loved Me recalled an era when the singer's trademark pithy self-pity still felt vital, full of inspired humour and vengeful vitriol, rather than merely churlish. But all three tunes seemed smaller and clumsier than their original versions.

The patron saint of kitchen-sink melancholy claims to have matured and left his depressive youthful persona behind, but he clearly remains all too aware of how his lacklustre recent work cowers in the shadow of his exquisitely dolorous past. Although this latest tour may not diminish his already tarnished legend it is, equally, unlikely to win many new converts.

STEPHEN DALTON

* item archived - comments / notes can no longer be added.

Comments / Notes



NME hack alert - NME hack alert - NME hack alert

RushHomeRuffian
London - Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 11:24:15 (PST) | #1




Morrissey will always be treated as a was by the industry, but that's okay. In a few years, they will call songs like "Alma Matters" and "Boy Racer""fine compositions from the singers solo back catalogue" also...

Henrik Rydéhn <[email protected]>
- Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 12:43:41 (PST) | #2




What about the fact that Morrissey had so much energy?? Or the great reactions he got from the crowd?? If you ask ANyone who has seen him this year.. they claim for these to be one/ IF not the best shows they have seen EVER. These "Jounalist" need to do their research then write about it. The fans arent complaining .. THEY are.

Unruly Girl
- Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 14:06:47 (PST) | #3




There are some people that don´t let this man to say anything incredible good and fair about the GREAT MORRISSEY.And I know who they are.

Maladjusted number two <[email protected]>
Lisbon - Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 15:29:35 (PST) | #4




IN GENERAL all critics everywhere are seethingly angry wanna bees WHO TAKE THERE RAGE AND FRUSTRATIONS OUT ON ALL THAT IS TRUE AND BEAUTIFUL,THAT IS WHY "MR.MORRISSEY"GETS SUCH A SHALLACKING WORLDWIDE,IN HIS OWN STRANGE WAY HES ALWAYS BEEN TRUE TO YOU,LOVER OF THE "MOZZER",TO BE CONTINUED IN 2000 AND FOREVER,YOURS,PUNCTURED BICYCLE

PUNCTURED BICYCLE
U.S.A. - Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 18:50:43 (PST) | #5




this journalist has his points. Morrissey immediate post-Smiths was his finest. Song such as Alma Matters and Boy Racer lack the normal emotion that the true fans know Morrissey is capiable of. Morrissey needs to give the real fans a show and stop catering to the new, less estabilished fans. I however don't understand the negative undertones about Morrissey's career. Morrissey is just being Morrissey!
My advice to this journalist, is that he should stick to writing articles about Rage against the Machine and Korn.

Nobody's Nothing <[email protected]>
- Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 00:56:20 (PST) | #6




Alma matters lacks emotion ?

What song were you listening to.

What do you mean real fans anyway ?

That reviewers a complete twat. At least the guardian review was good.

DUG <[email protected]>
- Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 03:22:29 (PST) | #7




Oh dear..predictable, but still disappointing from The Times. This was the first time I've seen him live, and my girlfriend's seventh, and neither of us were disappointed. Moz's voice was excellent, the band faultless, and better still he seemed to be confident and in good spirits - NOT acting like some sort faded has been (as suggested by the article). This sort of article is boring. It just doesn't wash anymore. Our advice to any journalist wanting to write something REALLY provocative ? Try the truth - Morrissey STILL HAS IT !!

The Wythenshawe Waltzers
- Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 11:37:35 (PST) | #8




Will Morrissey show at the West Ham game on
Sat 18/12?

David Beckham
- Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 12:01:44 (PST) | #9




Well, I was at the Notts gig, and I wasn't disappointed. True, I do prefer some of the old gems like Hairdresser on fire (B side, too) and all that. But this gig has given me renewed fervour in El Mozz.
The backing band sounded very rough, especially the rhythm section, but that was more than likely due to it being a new set-up, and the fact that it was the first performance on home turf.

Now I'm just waiting for Hartlepool, i don't bother with the papers, really.

Fickle finger of fate

JP <[email protected]>
Tench Street - Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 13:07:39 (PST) | #10




the point is: this stupid journalist is jealous that morrissey causes all these emotions in his fans.

the journalist was prepared for an completely unsucces - but success came, so he made such a horrible review.

and he didn't quote speedway, now my heart is full...

Fabricio <[email protected]>
- Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 19:07:32 (PST) | #11




I was also at this gig and I found both Mr Morrisseys humour and vocal integrity to be intact. From an audience point of view it was however one of the more physical of his shows. I thought the set to be rather unusual and a nice change. One "fan" next to me commented that he did not recognise most of the songs! This came as some surprise to me. I personally prefer to hear a mix of b sides etc, whilst I realise that there is a need to play singles and more recent material - I thought that it made a nice change instead of plugging all new material. The only gripe I had is that the support (Sack) had a much better sound mix.

ELVIS
NEWPORT SOUTH WALES - Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 15:49:19 (PST) | #12






* return to Morrissey-solo