posted by davidt on Monday November 23 2009, @01:00PM
15minuteswithyou writes:
NME has revealed its top 50 albums of the noughties, as voted for by 'leading lights in the music industry', and it doesn't contain any album by Morrissey. The full list can be viewed here:

NME's Top 50 Albums Of The Past Decade - Sky News
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • No Morrssey
    east of eden -- Monday November 23 2009, @01:04PM (#345169)
    (User #21981 Info)
    • Re:A Disgrace by Anonymous (Score:0) Tuesday November 24 2009, @09:53AM
  • nothing in the noughties beats vauxhall or your arsenal
    quarry is probbably the best offering
    ringleader was a bit shite
    and Years is good, but not worthy of top 50
    Anonymous -- Monday November 23 2009, @01:17PM (#345171)
  • Quarry should be on that list. Shame shame shame on NME.
    Boxers71 -- Monday November 23 2009, @01:24PM (#345173)
    (User #20608 Info)
  • But also some terrible ones. I'm pretty sure Babyshambles and Wino are only there because impressionable tweenies think that drugs are indicative of great artistry. To my mind that Babyshambles album was a noisy, cliched mess and Back to Black had about four good songs on it.

    Bright Eyes they got right and Ryan Adams is great, but wrong album, it's 2000's 'Heartbreaker' all the way.

    They must be slapping themselves on the back that they managed to put together a list without one of the most culturally defining artists of the last quarter century, just because he fell out with their rag. YATQ deserves to be on there for marking Morrissey's comeback to the big time and giving us two anthems in IBEH and FOTGTD. It also had some cracking B-sides.

    But, if they're talking about influential albums that changed the face of noughties music (and not always for the better) then they have them here and Morrissey shouldn't really be up there, as he hasn't changed anything in the cultural landscape this decade.

    But he doesn't need to, he's in a class of his own, whilst most of the people on this list are re-ploughing the furrow he dug 25 years ago. Let's face it, half of the bands and artists there wouldn't exist if it weren't for The Smiths.

    They shouldn't put Morrissey on the list, they should credit him with its existence.
    Mozzersgirl -- Monday November 23 2009, @02:52PM (#345184)
    (User #14229 Info)
    "There's more evil in the charts than in an al-Qaeda suggestion box" - Bill Bailey
  • Morrissey could have come up with 2 epoch-defining albums if he'd been just a little more adventurous with the sound.

    The songs are superb but some of the music isn't quite up to those high standards and there are 3 or 4 bad songs on each record.

    Still, nothing changes. It's all a part of his charm.

    For those who doubt it, just think of this album of songs with some more experimental music and production:

    You Know I Couldn't Last - perfect as it is
    Dea God Please Help Me - see above
    FOTGTD - a harder, livelier, californian sound a la live version
    Good in Your Time - perfect as it is
    Far Off Places - could have done with a genuinely heavy feel and some hired in blues guitar, maybe a swamp rock sound a la second coming by the roses and some heavy, grinding loops counter-balanced with the kitch arabic sounds
    Arms Around Paris - glam it up with t rex guitars and strings
    Spoke to Carole - perfect
    It's Not Your Birthday - emptier, more haunting sound
    Come Back To Camden - just imagine this with a nice dream by radiohead feel. Blissful, real grand piano with voice and then rising strings and synth effects
    Something is Squeezing - let the new york dolls play guitar on this one
    Mama - perfect as it is
    You Have Killed Me - should be a little longer

    broken
    Anonymous -- Monday November 23 2009, @06:26PM (#345221)
  • The 90's was one of the worst eras for music. The 80's were bad as well, but the 90's became musically one dimensional. The 60's were the best era, hands down. I think we all know that.

    Grunge, and its impostors dominated the 90's scene, and it forced other artists to try their hand at the sound, or get tossed aside.

    Unfortunately, the grunge trend gave us Southpaw Grammar, and Maladjusted as well. Many groups who weren't indulging in that sound were getting cut left and right, and it seems that this was Morrissey's way of trying to remain relevant.

    However, any list that does not innclude Your Arsenal, or V&I on it, is a list that isn't even worth reading. Of course, lists like this one are generally meaningless in the first place, but they often allow people to know what was occurring during that time.

    Your Arsenal, and V&I are two of the most original, and certainly two of the best albums of the 90's. They stood out against what was mostly morose, tuneless, sludge rock that had little to say, or bored strum-jams for bleeding hearts. It was the last decade where the music industry and the mainstream media had full control over cultural trends. Either you liked what the media gave you, or you had to struggle to uncover what others were doing.

    In retrospect, and in terms of quality, V&I was Morrissey's last gasp. It would have been a great way to go out.
    Nick The Name -- Monday November 23 2009, @10:35PM (#345235)
    (User #20764 Info)
    • Re:Another meaningless list. by Anonymous (Score:0) Tuesday November 24 2009, @03:59AM
    • clueless fuck strikes again by Anonymous (Score:0) Tuesday November 24 2009, @04:45AM
      • Re:clueless fuck strikes again by Nick The Name (Score:1) Tuesday November 24 2009, @05:23AM
        • Re:clueless fuck strikes again by Anonymous (Score:0) Tuesday November 24 2009, @10:51AM
        • Re:clueless fuck strikes again by Anonymous (Score:0) Tuesday November 24 2009, @11:12AM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Actually, if you had the chance to read the liner notes on the Southpaw Grammar reissue, Morrissey admitted that the musicianship on that album can be more comparative to the prog-rock movement of the 70s than it is with grunge. The album was basically a showcase for his band.

          Morrissey was always reactionary to what was going on in the music scene. The Smiths were reactionary with their jangly guitars when everyone else goofed around on sythesizers.

          Moz as a solo artist truly came out with Kill Uncle and subsequently the tour of rockabilly musicians when grunge was the sound du jour.

          Morrissey released Vauxhall and I during the time of rah-rah Britpop and droning acid house music.

          Morrissey is reactionary now in the sense that he is perhaps louder and prouder than what the music intelligensia think a man his age and relevance should be. He is defining the "aging artist" just as he did as a young man who defined what is was to be the "frontman" of a pop band.

          Then, just when you are braced to have your ears blown off, he can just as easily break your heart with a great ballad.

          Yeah, he's that good.
          mozmic_dancer -- Tuesday November 24 2009, @11:51AM (#345304)
          (User #11277 Info)
          "I am the fun and the fair, on a Mozsite for the criminally insane..."
          • 90's music was dull, and self-absorbed. by Nick The Name (Score:1) Tuesday November 24 2009, @08:25PM
            • Re:90's music was dull, and self-absorbed. by Deniston (Score:1) Wednesday November 25 2009, @04:15AM
            • You're jumping to too many conclusions, Nick. People on here are starting to think that's the only exercise you ever get.

              There is no attempt at revisionist history on my part, or on Morrissey's; the man was there; he documented what happened in the SG booklet. It's there for everyone to see.

              Morrissey chooses to work with musicians that share his musical tastes and influences. Boz and Alain are his musical and generational peers, so their earlier musical influences like glam or prog-rock are more apparent in the work, rather than any attempt to sound current or trendy. Even the looping of the Shostakovich piece in Teachers had more to do with Syd Barret than Eddie Vedder. In Morrissey's mind, "grunge" was nothing more than a bunch of hippies playing punk; he admitted that much in the '95 Q interview.

              You conveniently left out Teachers, the Operation, and Southpaw and dismissed it as "filler". Those songs were collaborative, deliberate, and essential to the theme and artistic success of Southpaw Grammar. The album was meant for the musicians to flex some musical muscle. If those three songs were “filler“, then at 28:10 minutes total, that's the longest recorded attempt at "filler" in the history of recorded music!

              You consider Southpaw Grammar to be a failure. On a commercial and critical level it was; critics are and still too hung up on Morrissey’s work with the Smiths to appreciate the musical merits and neither UK or US record companies promoted the album because they had no intention of renewing Morrissey's contract.

              On an artistic level, Morrissey achieved what he set out to do. He must have felt strongly enough of the merits of the album that he felt it deserved a second release. Morrissey is wise enough to know that to a different generation, it all sound new.
              mozmic_dancer -- Wednesday November 25 2009, @10:18AM (#345396)
              (User #11277 Info)
              "I am the fun and the fair, on a Mozsite for the criminally insane..."
            • Southpaw not grunge! by Boxers71 (Score:1) Thursday November 26 2009, @12:04PM
        • Re:clueless fuck strikes again by Anonymous (Score:0) Saturday November 28 2009, @05:25AM
        • Re:clueless fuck strikes again by rattlemybones (Score:1) Saturday November 28 2009, @06:14AM
    • Re:Another meaningless list. by mozmic_dancer (Score:1) Tuesday November 24 2009, @08:55AM
    • Nick: wrong decade! by Anonymous (Score:0) Tuesday November 24 2009, @10:49AM
    • Re:Another meaningless list. by Anonymous (Score:0) Tuesday November 24 2009, @11:19AM
    • Re:Another meaningless list. by Nick The Name (Score:1) Tuesday November 24 2009, @08:36PM
  • Kinda surprised not to see Franz'a debut in there. They used to be NME darlings and it's still a pretty fine album. I love the libertines but really the second libs album and the 1st babyshambles were very very patchy and dont deserve to be there.
    Anonymous -- Monday November 23 2009, @11:34PM (#345238)
  • ...the nme reveals, needs no further investigation.
    clearly still smarting from the law suits, the loss of readership and public lambasting of its staff and editor.
    In a list of quality British music magazines since 1990 it wouldn't make the top 100.
    Anonymous -- Tuesday November 24 2009, @04:04AM (#345252)
  • Morrissey isn't between that list of hyped bands

    Is here a band or artist in that list who had released something past century?
    Celibate Cry <[email protected]> -- Tuesday November 24 2009, @08:22AM (#345273)
    (User #220 Info)
    and the hills are alive with celibate cries
    • Re:releaved by Anonymous (Score:0) Thursday December 03 2009, @06:13AM
  • This list is a total joke. 75% of this list is terrible. I can't believe Babyshambles made the list. I betcha Pete Doherty gets sexiest man of the year, too. And Amy Winehouse?

    Maybe if Morrissey gets filmed shooting "H" he can make the list next decade.

    Urggh.

    Ken.
    sycophantic_slag -- Tuesday November 24 2009, @10:24AM (#345287)
    (User #3940 Info)
    "And I just can't explain/ So I won't even try to."
  • I bought the Q-Tip LP today. I assume that isn't in the Love Music Hate Racism NME's Top 50

    I also bought Young MC but that was released in 1989. Primal Scream Vanishing Point Happy Mondays debut LP The Horrors and A Tribe Called Quest

    My point is: Who gives a fuck what the NME's favourite albums of any era are? Personal music choice is extremely subjective. I don't need some spotty oik telling me what I should get

    BB
    Anonymous -- Tuesday November 24 2009, @10:40AM (#345290)
  • Live Squid. (Score:2, Funny)

    I'd rather Drown in a barrel of live squid than read the NME.
    Leopold Dilg -- Tuesday November 24 2009, @11:04AM (#345295)
    (User #21023 Info)
  • Horrible list, no New Pornographers or Morrissey.
    enolam -- Tuesday November 24 2009, @01:27PM (#345312)
    (User #21691 Info)
  • The NME needs a swift kick to the crotch.
    Anonymous -- Tuesday November 24 2009, @02:22PM (#345324)
  • why would the NME acknowledge Morrissey after the debacle with them recently - have you read it recently? it's become a student rag for aspiring non-entities, frankly i'd be embarrassed at any Morrissey association with it...
    Pinkie80 -- Tuesday November 24 2009, @04:16PM (#345342)
    (User #21968 Info)
  • Quarry should definitely have been high in the list. I think The Libertines have easily been the best band of the decade and both of the albums they released were fantastic.

    The first Strokes album was arguably the best, but the others they released were average. The first Kings Of Leon album was also brilliant, but the others they put out were possibly the worst of the decade. In fact I don't think I have ever been so disappointed by the path of a band as I have been with the Kings Of Leon.

    I think Arcade Fire have been the other stand out band.

    My top seven of the decade: -

    1. Is This It? - The Strokes
    2. The Libertines - The Libertines
    3. Chinese Democracy - Guns N' Roses
    4. You Are The Quarry - Morrissey
    5. Youth & Young Manhood - Kings Of Leon
    6. Up The Bracket - The Libertines
    7. Funeral - Arcade Fire

    There were many albums that had moments, such as the debut from Franz Ferdinand, but I don't feel I want to expand this list as I think these are pretty much essential.
    Jacknife Johnny -- Wednesday November 25 2009, @05:38AM (#345374)
    (User #12307 Info)
  • Quarry should be on the list.
    Anonymous -- Wednesday November 25 2009, @06:53AM (#345382)
  • who gives a monkeys what the NME think?
    I cant believe people still buy this rubbish!!!
    loyal Fan -- Wednesday November 25 2009, @07:13AM (#345384)
    (User #23029 Info)
  • It's bad enough to exclude Morrissey from the list, but to only place Spiritualized at no 36 really takes the biscuit. What a joke the NME has become.
    Anonymous -- Wednesday November 25 2009, @11:42AM (#345401)
  • "one man's poison is another man's meat, one man's agony another man's treat" (Bauhaus: Antonin Artaud)

    sorry about the gendered and carnivorous quote, but it sums up the taste issue quite well. these lists generate an excessive level of hatred and acerbic damnation. It's always disputed that the albums included shoudn't be, and the ones omitted have been greatly overlooked.

    Take solace in the fact that Morrissey is more usually included at the top of the more important 'greatest influence' polls, rather than some disposable NME sales generating roster.

    cheers

    wendy
    nightingale+therose -- Friday November 27 2009, @04:51PM (#345454)
    (User #23209 Info)
    nil carborundum illegitimi
  • Are you really this impressed by the bands that made it onto the list? Is the NME an independent music magazine or do they have a share in the sales of certain bands?
    Anonymous -- Monday November 23 2009, @02:48PM (#345183)
  • So are you "young and sexy" then? C'mon, let's av yer!

    And as for "Nobody cares anymore" well I beg to differ, there's the people who buy his records, attend his gigs and write about him, frequently. He's also in the media quite often these days. Plenty care, even if you don't.

    And in reality, you do care don't you? I mean you're here, posting on his fan site. You cared enough to visit and took time to post, how sweet of you.

    You're also very hung up on Morrissey's appearance, are you sure there's not a naked man, standing laughing in your dreams and that you know who it is, but you don't like what it means?
    Mozzersgirl -- Monday November 23 2009, @03:10PM (#345185)
    (User #14229 Info)
    "There's more evil in the charts than in an al-Qaeda suggestion box" - Bill Bailey
  • Oh dear, how offensive! Such hateful fans on this lovely website!
    Boxers71 -- Monday November 23 2009, @04:47PM (#345206)
    (User #20608 Info)
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.


[ home | terms of service ]