posted by davidt on Monday October 04 2004, @01:00PM
Angela of MorrisseyTour.com writes:

The news through the grapevine is that apparently Sanctuary is fuming over the KROQ thing. You remember, that conversation where Morrissey called in KROQ to announced the make up shows for inland invasion. The folks at Sanctuary are upset that this web site revealed that the caller was not Morrissey, but rather Charlie Browne, a long time crew member. No, I haven’t receive my official fatwa (yet). Although I’ve been assured of its arrival

It was my personal opinion that the caller was not Morrissey. I’ve known Charlie Brown for the past 5 years and am familiar with his voice. Additionally, I spoke with three of his former co-workers all who agreed it was him.

Sanctuary and KROQ insist that Morrissey was the caller. Sanctuary and KROQ would never lie or deceive us so we must take their word as the truth. The caller was so obviously Morrissey that it seems perplexing that I could have confused him for anyone else. Mea Culpa. I stand corrected. I was wrong.

I can assure you that the rumours regarding Morrissey not being the caller are false and the integrity of Sanctuary and KROQ cannot be questioned! They handled a very difficult situation impeccably and you should treat anything you are told to the contrary as rubbish.

Additionally, I, Angela (of MorrisseyTour.com) want to clarify that the account of events leading up to the rumour that Morrissey was not caller in the phone call to KROQ on September 28, 2004, previously was posed on this site.

The above mentioned account was not trying to question ever the professionalism either of the Artist or of his Management or KROQ. MorrisseyTour.com apologizes should any of the relation of events included in our website have caused any misunderstanding between the KROQ and the Artist, his Management and his fans.

MorrisseyTour.com did everything possible in order to confirm the veracity of the rumour. On the other hand, MorrisseyTour.com declares and recognizes that KROQ, the Artist and Sanctuary Artist Management are correct in saying that Morrissey was the actual caller.

Finally, MorrisseyTour.com regrets any distress this matter has caused KROQ, the Artist and Sanctuary Artist Management venue and hopes that no fans were misled in our very obvious mistake!

---
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • It wasn't Morrissey. "Y'know whadda mean?"
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:08PM (#128217)
  • ouch ouch ouch

      i wonder what morrissey has to say about this? he apologized for the spin cover, urged us not to become so enthralled with the humerist and malady lingers on dvds...

      what are we supposed to think this time?
    imaman -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:10PM (#128218)
    (User #12126 Info)
  • if that was moz Im a zebra

    Who the heck is in charge?? So very shady....
    giant -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:12PM (#128221)
    (User #430 Info)
    I Like You
    • Hear, hear! by alainsane (Score:1) Monday October 04 2004, @06:38PM
  • David Tseng posts another rumour. Does the guy do anything else?

    p.s. how is the 50 million dollar lawsuit against KROQ going?
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:14PM (#128225)
  • The Truth, Again. (Score:0, Redundant)

    It seems to me, Morrisseytour.com only retracts their belief/statement in order to stay out of the way of may-stir trouble from KROQ & Camp Morrissey. It wasn't Morrissey. We all, or most of us, are aware of that fact and I'm sure the kids at Moztour.com believe the same still. KROQ people do not want to look like fools because of the false Moz caller and Sanctuary is desperately trying to keep their respect, which has been falling mind you, and move on with their "integrity".

    Sanctuary handles situations poorly. Late updates on Website. No proper cancellation announcements when needed. A terrible money sucking and terribly organized tour. Sad.
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:16PM (#128227)
  • Somebody from the label/band/sad radio station scared them issuing an apology it seems. I do hope the label/band/sad radio station feel like big boys now, you've done a great job bullying someone who has done no harm to any of you or your wallets/integrity.

    I am sure the rumor was started by a rep from either the band/crew/label anyway but it is nice to see you(label/band/sad radio station) found a little scape-goat. Well done.

    Angela, i guess future guest list spot are now in jeopardy, sorry.
    "Theres more to life than gigs, you know....but not much more"
    Johnny Marr -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:17PM (#128229)
    (User #1113 Info)
    Going Underground
  • The caller was so obviously NOT Morrissey. Anyone vaguely familiar with his voice could tell that. Also, the caller did not have the quick wit that Morrissey is so famously known for. I can't believe anyone would fall for it...
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:17PM (#128230)
  • Now, the next step in planning will be Sanctuary forcing Morrissey to submit himself to false truth and announce "It was me who telephoned KROQ". He will be paid or threatened by SANC. to make such announcement.

    Oh, their important "integrity".
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:22PM (#128237)
  • Sanctuary (Score:2, Insightful)

    Don't you have anything better to do, than to bully a fan site? And one that supported your artist years before you were around?
    Sharron Needles -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:25PM (#128239)
    (User #762 Info)
    Inside every adult male is a denied little boy -Nancy Friday
  • it was actually morrissey impersonating charlie browne.
    suzanne -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:37PM (#128245)
    (User #36 Info)
    I scare dead people.
  • I am with the bloke / or woman who said they were a zebra if that was morrissey.

    As a fan right from the days of the smiths I am not having it. Dont care less what they say, unless he had a voice transplant that was not Morrissey.
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:45PM (#128247)
  • It was NOT Morrissey. No Matter what anyone says, I've been listening to that voice for almost 20 years and know it wasn't him.
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:46PM (#128248)
  • what a bunch of tossers, trying to save face this late in the game!!!!
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:48PM (#128251)

  • The use of the sanctuary quote from the cancellation of the original gig for example. The qualification of the sources backing up the thought. The amazing "it was so obviously morrissey" comment. Considering they said it was not him how can they say, oh yes it was obviously him how could we think it not!

    I think this is firmly tongue in cheek and dont think they believe a word of it either.
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:51PM (#128255)
  • I seem to be the only one left who thinks there was a strong possibility this was Morrissey. A grumpy slurry first thing in the morning Moz (noone is witty 24 hours a day) but nevertheless his voice sounded pretty close to me.
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @01:54PM (#128258)
    • Are you mad? (Score:2, Informative)

      So what if it was early in the morning...8AM
      Do you think it wasn't arranged for "him" to be on the phone? Do you think they cold called him? Did they woke him out of his bloody sleep? "Huh...wha...the phone is a ringing..what bloody rubbish....who be a ringing me so early..?..Oh Bean..it's you lot...Blimey...wha?...were on the air?"

      Morrissey's part of the actual conversation:
      "Hallo, Good morning..uh...89% I should say...Well it was during the morning of the show..I found that, ah...I could almost hardly speak, and it was, ah, sinusitis, larangitis, and the doctor did tell me, uh, ya, ya know ya can't even sing, ya can't speak, ya must rest, and I had a terribly heavy fever...yes, yes, of course, well, I feel terribly disappointed for them, and, and for myself, I wanted to be there...Well, no, umf, it comes and goes, it's uh, uh, it's very difficult sometimes, when I'm singing constantly on tour, and, uh ya know, the pressures of touring, gives my throat an absolute ratching, do ya know what I mean?...I tend just to drink a lot of tea...um, we were ,we were, having to do a video at the same time and that had to go as well...yes, well, ya know...I'll plod along...uuhh...I..I'm ok, yes...jus a second...uuhh...I was jus...(unitelligible mumble)...what was that again you said?...yes...ehhh...lemmee, uh lemmeee jus uh, gather my thoughts here for jus a second...it's uh, gunna be on October 31st, which I believe is Haloween...it will be at the, uh, Hyundai Pavillion, so I hope you do keep listening to, uh, K-rock, go to k-rock dot com, and there you'll find all the details...that's correct...yes, we'll, uh, umm, very excited about the show coming up at the Universal Amphitheater...uh...it's rather busy...so I am told...It's the doctor's orders...thank you"

      Other peoples voices were heard and he said it was quite busy there, so it isn't like he had just woken up. The more I listen to this conversation, the less it sounds like him.

      I have the recording if anyone wants it emailed to them.
      someraincoatedlovers -- Monday October 04 2004, @03:08PM (#128322)
      (User #10290 Info)
  • the deadest of giveaways. Man, Creative Artist Agency and Sanctuary are really flexing their muscles for Moz.
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @02:31PM (#128296)
  • Can KROQ and Sanctuary please explain who told "Morrissey" what to say on the phone.
    I'm referring to the "I'm excited"-whisper at the end of the conversation.
    Sven68 -- Monday October 04 2004, @02:32PM (#128297)
    (User #4431 Info | http://www.keiselt.de/westham)
  • It was NOT Morrissey. It was not MORRISSEY. It WAS not Morrissey. IT WAS NOT MORRISSEY. It was not, it was not, it was not Morrissey. It was not, it was not, it was not Morrissey. It was not, it was not, it was not Morrissey. It was not, it was not, it was not Morrissey. It was not, it was not, it was not Morrissey. It was not, it was not, it was not Morrissey.
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @02:35PM (#128298)
  • im never in the loop. where can i hear this interview?
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @02:52PM (#128311)
  • oh my god.... (Score:1, Interesting)

    can everyone just fucking relax already? in the big grand scheme of life does it make an ounce of difference? even if it wasn't morrissey and even if kroq and sanctuary are now fibbing, does it really still matter. hundreds of thousands dead in sudan, thousands dead in iraq and the teenagers of morrissey-solo prattle on about the most pathetic of things. he is giving a make-up show. you'll go. you know you will. why not put your money where your fucking mouths are? if you want to make a statement, stop going to shows. stop buying the albums and singles. stop visiting (and latetly this doesn't even seem like one) a morrissey fan site. have we already forgotten the fact that sanctuary was the ONLY label to give moz a glance? have we already forgotten how incredibly well they pushed yatq? get a clue
    VIVAMOZ <[email protected]> -- Monday October 04 2004, @03:11PM (#128324)
    (User #184 Info | http://www.cato.org/)
    blame me! i didn't vote!
  • That I am already annoyed with MorrisseyTour.com for never sending my t-shirt after I ordered and paid with pay-pal. But that's another story for another day.

    Nonetheless, even tough they put me 20 bucks under, I side with them -- definitely not Morrissey.

    -Excited about New York -- the Saturday Philly show was perfect. MMMMM
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @03:40PM (#128333)
  • to me it does sound like Morrissey...a very sick, apathetic, distracted, irritated Morrissey.

    As for the colloquisms...Morrissey HAS lived in the U.S. for the last 7 or so years, and "you know what I mean?" is a common saying in the US.

    Furthermore, most of us don't hear Morrissey off guard...he obviously was supposed to say certain things that he didn't have a script for, and to have things whispered probably threw him off a little.
    veradicere -- Monday October 04 2004, @05:08PM (#128358)
    (User #8315 Info)
  • Judging from the statement, Moz probably deployed an army of lawyers to Morrisseytour.com. You can actually smell the trousers hanging in the Moztour.com bathroom after the call from the Legal Eagles...the crotch area probably has skid marks longer than the Nazca Lines of Peru.
    Fence -- Monday October 04 2004, @05:12PM (#128359)
    (User #1034 Info)
    Heel in the back, size 13
  • How very unabashed, grotesque and callous. We all know it wasn't him. Who are they thinking they're talking to? Britney Spears fans? Sassiness!
    If they don't understand how ridiculous what they do is, they won't certainly get the irony of Angela's (very well written) response.
    (Knowing Morrissey, I wouldn't even be surprised if he was the initiator of this. Like I said, we know him.)
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @06:17PM (#128367)
  • BTW Angela: (Score:1, Informative)

    Please DO PUT that Audio off your site! I don't want to be SCREAMED AT! It's not even original, it's impertinence. It's a reason I often chose not not visit your site, as I'd rather continue listening to music and not want to turn my speakers down or if not listening check the level before going on your site.
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @06:23PM (#128368)
    • i agree by giant (Score:1) Tuesday October 05 2004, @11:06AM
  • LOL, this is just too funny for words! Hehehehe, omg, lol, hehehehe. Thanks, Morrisseytour.com, for the BEST Laugh of 2004!!

    A special 'thank you' goes out to all the Gossip Queens who fan and feed on this shit! You've all made my day.
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @07:06PM (#128376)
  • I ran a 50 second segment of just "Morrissey"s voice through a program called Ex-Sense. Its corporate version is touted as an effective way to detect interviewees of planning to do bad things. The consumer version (the one I used) is supposed to be able to tell when a person is lying, stressed, etc. Here's the analysis report for that 50 second segment:

    Final Report: (Risk)
    >General Mood:
            Start-Thinking... End-Highly Stressed
    >Excitement level:L-0.0%, H-0.0%, E-0.0%, {NEG:0.0%}
    >Confusion level:L-0.0%, H-0.0%, E-0.0%
    >Stress level:L-0.0%, H-0.0%, E-100.0%
    >Out-Smart level:0.0%

    >FINAL RISK LEVEL:0.0%

    =======================
    The subject was not EXCITED AT ALL during the test.
    The subject was Very Confident during the test.
    ! The SUBJECT'S GENERAL STRESS level is HIGH!
    The subject was EXTREMELY STRESSED in too many segments. It is possible that the subject is hidding something!
      The subject tends to get stress easily.
    It appears that the subject spoke freely about all the issues!
    The subject invests Heavy Thinking while he/she speaks.
    ---------------------

    No Lies or Inaccuracies were detected.
    ---------------------
    Start CAL- EMO:558 COG:295 STR:24.00
    End CAL- EMO:497 COG:310 STR:46.56
    ---------------------


    I think it's a fair enough analysis. The caller (whoever he was) wasn't lying about what happened to Morrissey. So long as he could pull off the overarching fib, the rest would be truthful. And since no one questioned the caller about really being Morrissey or not, he didn't have to answer to that lie-detection element. ;D
    mozchildren -- Monday October 04 2004, @07:57PM (#128383)
    (User #6214 Info)
  • If it really wasn't Morrissey (haven't heard it yet) what on earth was the point in saying it was?
    Just can't see the logic in the whole thing.
    Any theories?
    Anonymous -- Monday October 04 2004, @08:26PM (#128387)
  • Dear Jim,

    I can understand what Morrissey must be going through right now.
    I didn't do it either.

    -- Orenthal

    My bad. It was Moz. Nope, wasn't Charlie...or Linus...or...that black kid on the piano. It was Morrissey. I....have recently gotten my ears cleaned at the doctor's office and.....heard the tape again. I was wrong. Wasn't Morrissey. It also wasn't Morrissey at the trial a couple of years ago. The judge was all wrong. I know because he isn't really devious, truculent, and unreliable. Couldn't have been him there either.

    Dear Jim,

    Hope you like my show tonight at the Orpheum theatre!

    Sincerely,

    Jude Law

    That's not to say that Moz really is those things, but now it seems that his record company might be. Sorry Sanctuary. I had alot of respect for you in the beginning. But now I don't know what to think. Actually I do. You may be able to 'fake' or be fooled as to his voice, but while we don't all have his home number, we have seen him before. Don't try and sell us $30 shirts with Quentin Tarantino on it. We know him that much at least.
    Jim Rome -- Monday October 04 2004, @09:12PM (#128403)
    (User #720 Info | http://www.jimrome.com/)
    ...and how?
  • we Morrissey fans are idiots. We know what Morrissey sounds like and the person in the KROQ interview was *NOT* Morrissey.

    You guys (Sanctuary and KROQ) got caught and bullying morrisseytour.com to make a retraction is just pathetic.
    half-a-person -- Monday October 04 2004, @10:41PM (#128429)
    (User #69 Info)
    Alcohol: the cause of, and solution to, all of lifes problems
  • you (ie. a website owner) simply didn't respond to the initial emails from the party claiming damage in a case like this, where the actual "damage" is tenuous at best?

    Would they actually go to the trouble of physically coming to your house to deliver a summons or force the ISP to close a site down? Any lawyers here?

    If I were morrisseytour.com, I would've let Sanctuary spend (ie. waste) as much time and resources possible to see how far they'd go to make a little ol' fan site retract a statement.

    I'm not blaming morrisseytour.com for eventually caving in, but holy shit, they could've at least let Sanctuary wring their hands a bit longer before entering the Olympic backpedaling event...
    king leer -- Monday October 04 2004, @11:32PM (#128434)
    (User #80 Info)
  • it blatantly wasn't morrissey. i have heard many many interviews with the man and the tone, pitch, accent and mannerisms were completely different. That said, perhaps sanctuary genuinely believe it was him. who knows. people believe, or find it convenient to believe funny things - george bush, for example finds it convenient to believe that america plays no part in global warming.
    Anonymous -- Tuesday October 05 2004, @12:33AM (#128451)
  • Rumour!! It wasn't Angela that wrote the note from Morrisseytour.com! I'be known her for years and she would never write like that! How, in a million years, can anybody think it is Angela?
    ... just kidding, just kidding... (am I going to be sued?)
    Anonymous -- Tuesday October 05 2004, @01:01AM (#128459)
  • Ah, in America (and the UK for that matter); you infer incorrectly, get anything wrong, and beware the wrath of corporate law my friends (or freebies from Sanctury). I thought it was common place to always use allegedly within sentances.
    Anonymous -- Tuesday October 05 2004, @02:17AM (#128477)
  • I think it's been done to death, no?
    Anonymous -- Tuesday October 05 2004, @03:28AM (#128491)
  • It was my personal opinion that the caller was not Morrissey. I’ve known Charlie Brown for the past 5 years and am familiar with his voice. Additionally, I spoke with three of his former co-workers all who agreed it was him.

    That Morrissey, Sanctuary, and KROQ ganged up and bullied Angela into retracting her statement (a doubtless belief that the voice was Charlie Brown's) is totally repugnant and morally reprehensible.

    We all recognise His voice when we hear it, lurgy or no lurgy. Who are they trying to fool?

    Us fans should gang up on The Mozfather and refuse to buy his concert tickets in future.

    All this skullduggery only proves what a paragons of saintliness and virtue our old friends Mike Joyce and Andy Rourke truly are!
    Lazy Sunbather -- Tuesday October 05 2004, @06:43AM (#128552)
    (User #843 Info)
  • I'm Morrissey!
    Anonymous -- Tuesday October 05 2004, @07:22AM (#128562)
    • Hehe. by dallow_bg (Score:1) Tuesday October 05 2004, @11:12AM
  • Just think, if Moz had pulled out of the Bridlington show with a cough, then this gossip rumour mill would have been even more explosive.

    (I have it on good authority that the Bridlington venue sold 2 bags of chips and a pickled egg before Moz came on, there would have been hell to pay if people had splashed a lot of cash and then Moz hadn't turned up. Lucky it was just the tiny little KROQ thing that was canned.)
    Auric Goldfinger -- Tuesday October 05 2004, @07:33AM (#128568)
    (User #3416 Info)
    Do my eyes deceive me, or is Senna's Lotus sounding rough?
  • I do find not only insulting that Sanctuary seems to think that we all are a bunch of brainless idiots, but that they would have such an aggressive approch when it comes to fan sites is totally pathetic. This was NOT Morrissey. Full stop. We all know that.Angela was not doing anthing particularly wrong.I start to believe that Sanctuary views those two site (Morrissey-solo. and morrisseytour) as nusisance and I bet they would eventually try to shut them down all together.I do not rely on morrisseymusic.com to get info about moz tours or see pics etc.. because the site is simply amazingly boring! It's about time Mark and jed or/ and whoever is in charge at Sanct, start to show a bit more respects to the fans, because they, do I need to remind them, are those who are paying for the cd's, tickets concerts etc..

    We are not fools!
    Anonymous -- Tuesday October 05 2004, @09:56AM (#128622)
  • Funny! (Score:0, Troll)

    I have no idea if that was Morrissey. I would like to believe Morrissey is above calling in to such a cheesy and slick sounding radio show. From my listening of the MP3, there are moments when it sounds like Morrissey to me (although very groggy, ill, and out of it), and there are moments where it sounds like an imposter. So I cannot say for sure either way.

    What I find funny are two thing.

    One is that this MorrisseyTour.com person originally was full of shit when she claimed to have it "on good authority" that it was Charlie Brown who called in. Whether her hunch is right or wrong, she LIED when she said she had it on good authority. Thus, I now proclaim her the Dan Rather of Morrissey fan site journalists.

    Second, it's interesting how people are always so suspicious of Morrissey. Whether people are right or wrong in this instance, perhaps Morrissey should think about why people suspect he's always BSing about things.
    LoafingOaf <reversethis-{moc ... otstnilfcitnarf}> -- Tuesday October 05 2004, @10:36AM (#128638)
    (User #778 Info)
    Fuck it, Dude. Let's go bowling.
    • Re:Funny! by Anonymous (Score:0) Tuesday October 05 2004, @02:11PM
      • Re:Funny! by LoafingOaf (Score:0) Tuesday October 05 2004, @03:23PM
        • Re:Funny! by Anonymous (Score:0) Tuesday October 05 2004, @03:31PM
          • Re:Funny! by Anonymous (Score:0) Tuesday October 05 2004, @03:43PM
            • Re:Funny! by Anonymous (Score:0) Tuesday October 05 2004, @03:47PM
              • Re:Funny! by LoafingOaf (Score:1) Tuesday October 05 2004, @08:47PM
    • Troll? by LoafingOaf (Score:0) Tuesday October 05 2004, @08:43PM
      • Re:Troll? by Anonymous (Score:0) Tuesday October 05 2004, @11:26PM
        • Re:Troll? by LoafingOaf (Score:1) Wednesday October 06 2004, @02:22AM
          • Re:Troll? by Anonymous (Score:0) Wednesday October 06 2004, @02:25AM
  • Sad to say... (Score:2, Interesting)

    It's disappointing to see that MorrisseyTour.com has now been bullied as a way of protecting what is clearly a lie perpetrated by (at least) two big businesses on behalf of Morrissey.

    It's no secret that our dear Moz has a history of missing gigs due to illness. He has gone on record about having problems with depression, in the past, and this is no doubt behind many of the cancellations. We love Morrissey for what he is - that is the beauty of his art.

    Nevertheless, cancelling the KROQ appearance (particularly when considered alongside other recent cancellations and the label's attempt at an overall media blitz) obviously required more damage control than usual. In addition to issuing a laboriously detailed explanation (Christ, how often do we see a doctor's name quoted in these things?), Morrissey's management - either Sanctuary or his representation - worked out a deal with KROQ to have Morrissey announce the replacement dates live and on air. Everybody's happy, including the fans who get the added touch of hearing from their hero.

    Problem is, Morrissey (for probably the same reasons as his various other cancellations, over the years) didn't want to do this particular bit of PR work. He's never struck me as the sort of guy to go for this stuff. But the business-types set it up and he had to somehow comply. So he had his mate handle the call. Maybe that was Moz whispering in his ear, maybe someone else entirely.

    But c'mon, it obviously wasn't Morrissey. At least give the fans that much credit. We've spent fortunes on his music and videos. We know what his voice sounds like. It wasn't him.

    It was kind of funny, initially, to hear the audio clip and realize that Moz had pulled one over on KROQ. Kind of strange to even try pulling something like that, in the digital age, but oh well - another bizarre story for Moz.

    It was disappointing to see KROQ's post, denying the truth. But I guess they really didn't know better. They were truly duped.

    But now it's really disappointing to see MorrisseyTour.com getting bullied around. They were just telling the truth.

    This is the kind of bullshit that the George W's of the world get up to. It's really, really disappointing, coming from the people in Morrissey's circle.

    Hopefully this rundown feels as clear and reasonable to everyone else as it does to me.
    Anonymous -- Tuesday October 05 2004, @03:34PM (#128800)
  • Nice, you insult someone and then post anonymously. How pathetic.
    cat woman -- Monday October 04 2004, @07:51PM (#128381)
    (User #12445 Info)
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.


[ home | terms of service ]