posted by davidt on Friday September 20 2002, @04:30AM
Old Fossil writes:

A link that I received in the Rolling Stone Weekly Newsletter with 13 recent exclusive photos.

Viva Morrissey! - The reclusive crooner sighted in California
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • But who needs to see 13 photos staring up his nostrils? A little variety would have been nice.
    jade <[email protected]> -- Friday September 20 2002, @09:55AM (#42316)
    (User #90 Info)
    Zip up your mouth!
  • I think it's time to stop taking live photo's of dear old Moz.
    Anonymous -- Friday September 20 2002, @01:13PM (#42345)
  • These are the best pictures I've seen from the tour and people are still bitching. I wondered to myself if it was "all over" a few times too, but three of the new songs are of A+ quality and 20 still not heard. The tour and Kilborn appearances were great, I think our old boy'll shut up the nay sayers again very soon with and ace album. Patience kiddies!!!
    Anonymous -- Friday September 20 2002, @10:12PM (#42399)
  • Having just looked at all 13 pics at The Rolling Stones site, I have to say I don't share the common view of recent concert goers that Moz is looking fitter, lighter, spritely and in top form and shape.

    I see a man who is prematurely aging, incredible sadness in his eyes, a furrowed brow with a general aura of tiredness, melancholy and defeatism.

    I felt very sad looking at these recent photographs.

    I'm worried..................
    Lazy Sunbather -- Saturday September 21 2002, @08:29AM (#42425)
    (User #843 Info)
  • I just saw him in London and believe me, these photos are not in the slightest bit representative of how he really looks.
    He really does look great in person, and I think whoever chose those pictures to put on the site must hate him.
    They were all taken from a very unflattering angle, but even so I can't understand how they managed to drain the life out of him in each and every photo, it's just odd.
    If I was Morrissey I would sue them for slander, they have misrepresented him.
    Trust me, he looks a million times better, fitter, more handsome, more energetic, and more ALIVE in real life.
    Anonymous -- Saturday September 21 2002, @03:44PM (#42456)
  • perhaps he just isnt as photogenic as he used to be, or we could just blame camera technology's changes over the years on misrepresenting that heavenly body which belongs to dear ol' moz.

    regardless of that or any other said comments.
    i think morrissey looks great!
    and i love the outfits on this tour, very sharp, indeed. better than a t-shirt that gets all gross when he gets sweaty!
    shoplifter-nyc -- Saturday September 21 2002, @11:24PM (#42468)
    (User #6334 Info | http://suedehead.freewebspace.com/)
    Having learned my lesson ,I never left an impression on anyone .
    • Re:Photogenic? by Anonymous (Score:0) Sunday September 22 2002, @10:28AM
      • Re:Photogenic? by shoplifter-nyc (Score:1) Sunday September 22 2002, @07:49PM
  • im so very sickened,
    i am so sickened now....
    these pictures make me want to cry and squeeze
    lemons into my eyes.
    pillow -- Sunday September 22 2002, @08:41AM (#42486)
    (User #5286 Info)


[ home | terms of service ]