Morrissey-solo
Archive
|
|
|||||||||
posted by
davidt
on Tuesday November 13 2001, @10:30AM
An anonymous person writes:
This story was in the Boston Sunday Globe. It's so true, but I bought the new 'Best of' anyway. "With reissues, what's old is always new again" By Steve Greenlee, Globe Staff, 11/11/2001 Excerpt: It's amazing how artists and record companies can release so many new albums without having new material to put on them. It's the marketing of nostalgia: You get to pay again for what you've already heard, and for what you already have. And some of these performers are sticking the same songs on compilation after compilation.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
"With reissues, what's old is always new again" - Boston Globe (Nov. 11, 2001)
| Top
| 32 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|||||||||
|
You what?! (Score:1)
I don't know what it did Stateside, but it got higher up the British singles chart than any Smiths song.
And as for Morrissey fans being unable to help themselves buying repeated compilations - I didn't didn't buy either Smiths Best Of and won't be buying this his current Morrissey Best Of. Morrissey fans ARE capable of intelligent thought, that's why they're Morrissey fans.
Also, he gave a great concert in Boston in 97, so what's got the Globe so worked up?
(User #1418 Info)
He had it coming... (Score:1)
(User #1858 Info)
suedehead rocks! (Score:1)
(User #366 Info)
What the fugg??? (Score:0)
They still have something to say. (Score:0)
so cynical (Score:0)
The author may have a legit point about WORLD OF MORRISSEY, although Morrissey may have had other
reasons for that comp. As strange as that comp was, it does work pretty well from first track to last. I know, we can all make our own comp tapes. However, I don't think
the author is fair about the other albums.
For example, my understanding on BONA DRAG was
it came out when Morrissey was having troubles,
do I have that right? Kill Uncle came in the wake, remember, and he needed a band then. Also, most fans I know consider BONA to be one of his top releases.
Every Morrissey fan I know counts it as a fave.
Now, yes, it did compile songs which came out on EPs, but not everyone has cool stores which carried those. And those go out of print faster.
And, those are more expensive to collect. And, yes, it had songs from VIVA HATE, but it was a singles comp.
HAirdresser on Fire, technically, was not really part of VIVA HATE -- just the U.S. version. But okay, I think we all know he probably felt pressure to put something out so people wouldn't forget about him. And he probably felt he had those quirky singles that had no home on an album.
My only gripe about BONA was it had an editted version of Will Never MArry.
Now, what of MY EARLY BURGLRAY YEARS? Some of the songs, such as Reader MEet Author, may have been an attempt to prompt people to give them a second listen, because they had been unjustly rejected by some. That comp is great regardless though.
I'm not sure how the author is counting things up.
Apparently he is including both BEST OFs, even though one was a UK release and the other is a U.S. release.
Also, a BEST OF makes sense at this point, as there is a new generation of kids out there who weren't born with knowledge of the Morrissey catalog.
I'm still not sure how the author is counting things up though. I'll have to look over the albums again, because I can't think of 5 albums Suedehead is on. Maybe I'm forgetting one. Or, is the author mistaking BEETHOVEN WAS DEAF for a compilation, meaning he hasn't heard it to know it's a live album? And he should know that to the World OF Morrissey, almost a parallel music industry it can seem, Suedehead *was* as important as Hound Dog.
My main point, though, is I'm not sure why such *cynical* motives have to be attached to everything. I doubt Morrissey is sitting around thinking, "My fans are so loyal, they'll be easy suckers for this crap." It's not easy to exist in the pop music world. The media will quickly forget you if you don't keep putting stuff out. But as I feel only one of the comps is problematic (WORLD), I don't see the problem.
Pure speculation, but perhaps WORLD was just to fulfill some contract? I don't know. It gives a home to Moon River and Whatever Happens, at least.
"Paint a Vulgar Picture," btw, is about record labels exploiting an artist and his fans AFTER he's DEAD. Comps like BONA, MY EARLY were carefully put together by the artist himself. They have no tacky badges. They are the solo years' equivalent of LOUDER THAN BOMBS and so forth, and those similar SMiths comps are cherished, as these are. I don't think anyone bought BONA and MY EARLY BURGLRARY and felt "decieved," so that's two that are clear of the charges.
You saw how angry Morrissey got at the recent Smiths compilation which he had no role in and which remixed his songs without his consent and so forth. That's more what he was talking about.
And rather than wanting money from that, he asked his fans to ignore it.
London is Dead (Score:1)
(User #3695 Info)
Oh, the Shame of it All (Score:1)
that was a great little article, although I've never read one that doesn't contain at least one error...same goes for articles on my religion.
anyone going to see shakira at tower in hollywood on saturday?
(User #1984 Info)
Unfortunately I agree with most of the article... (Score:0)
We have these songs already.
Are you behind payments on your Hollywood Hills home? Is the Porsche in danger of being repossessed? Why the need to recycle the same canisters of songs? Enough already! Sign a new deal or announce retirement. It's really that simple.
I´ll buy it in a second! (Score:0)
But what I can affirm is that Rhino compilations have a wonderful fidelity and if I can get a liquider, louder and clearer sound of the Moz crooning "I will be in the bar with my head on the bar" I´m game partners! Hope he tours and sings the whole fucking 21 songs plus the new B-sides contained on the maxi-singles of the old songs released as new singles...just a bit of sarcasm fellars that the Moz probably won´t like.
Come on = lets do it (Score:0)
What can I say! (Score:1)
I bought the new cd. What can I say? I love Morrissey. I like the pictures, the color of the sleeve, the commentary inside the sleeve, and I love to have all Morrissey cds. Call it a fetish. Call it love. Call it obsession. The cd looks good on my rack situated between other Morrissey cds as well.
I was actually upset that this same album was not put on cassette. I thought that would be fun to have for the car. But then I bought a 90 minute TDK tape and recorded all those songs plus three others on it. The funny thing is I cannot tell you how many times I have created one of these compilations for purposes of listening to Morrissey in the car. I am sure I made more than Morrissey and his record company. Oh well.
(User #3814 Info)
Seriously though........ (Score:0)
If Morrissey likes to do the whole depression / sadness thing, that's fine. I think most artist use those emotions to fuel a fire within that brings forth some of their most impressive works. It is what seperates an artist from a pop star wanker like Britney Spears. C'mon Morrissey, even the Cure had a "new" track on their greatest hits. 2 of 'em. (They sucked BTW)
Anyway with that said. Moz is still probably one of the best lyricists still around and i think the music industry as a whole could benefit from his work. So do some ^_^